Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Talk:Data From Gene Edited Animals: Difference between revisions
From BIF Guidelines Wiki
Latest comment: 16 October by Wsnelling in topic Comments on new content
No edit summary |
(→Comments on new content: Reply) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | == Comments on new content == | ||
* I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long. Good intro | * I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long. Good intro | ||
* Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data? | * Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data? | ||
* Should we | * Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC | ||
All good stuff. [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Should the recommendation to genotype offspring be extended to descendants, who may carry the edit? [[User:Wsnelling|Wsnelling]] ([[User talk:Wsnelling|talk]]) 18:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Makes sense. But how far down the pedigree do you go? Recommendations? [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 23:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::From a computing perspective does it matter how deep you go? [[User:Snewman|Snewman]] ([[User talk:Snewman|talk]]) 04:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::How about progeny of edit carriers? No need to worry about further tracking descendants who did not inherit the edit. [[User:Wsnelling|Wsnelling]] ([[User talk:Wsnelling|talk]]) 13:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 16 October 2024
Comments on new content[edit source | reply | new]
- I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long. Good intro
- Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data?
- Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC
All good stuff. Bruce L. Golden (talk) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Should the recommendation to genotype offspring be extended to descendants, who may carry the edit? Wsnelling (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense. But how far down the pedigree do you go? Recommendations? Bruce L. Golden (talk) 23:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- From a computing perspective does it matter how deep you go? Snewman (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- How about progeny of edit carriers? No need to worry about further tracking descendants who did not inherit the edit. Wsnelling (talk) 13:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- From a computing perspective does it matter how deep you go? Snewman (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense. But how far down the pedigree do you go? Recommendations? Bruce L. Golden (talk) 23:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
