Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Parentage Testing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Genotypic data are often used for parentage testing for embryo transfer calves, for cases of ambiguous breeding dates, and to establish sire identity of calves for producers who utilize multiple-sire pastures. The concept behind using genetic markers for parentage testing is based on the fact that each animal receives one allele from each parent, which makes up the animal's genotype | [[Category:Data Collection]] | ||
Genotypic data are often used for parentage testing for embryo transfer calves, for cases of ambiguous breeding dates, and to establish sire identity of calves for producers who utilize multiple-sire pastures. Additionally, potentially high-impact seedstock such as AI sires are often required to be parentage tested. The concept behind using genetic markers for parentage testing is based on the fact that each animal receives one allele from each parent, which makes up the animal's genotype For example, for an animal that is '''Aa''', the '''A''' came from one parent, while the '''a''' came from the other. But an animal cannot be, say, an '''AA''' if the sire was '''AA''' and the dam was '''aa'''. Because genotyping is not 100% accurate, many loci should be evaluated to determine if the designated parents are likely to be correct. | |||
One common misconception of parentage testing is that the test determines parentage absolutely. Rather, parentage testing excludes animals that '''cannot''' be the parents of a particular offspring. In the simplest terms, we use the genetic markers to exclude animals as possible parents, with the goal of having only two animals (a sire and a dam) left as the most likely parents for that offspring after all others have been excluded. This is why all possible parents must be genotyped and included in the comparison to get accurate results, but the inclusion of animals that can be excluded due to location, color, or other factors is discouraged. | One common misconception of parentage testing is that the test determines parentage absolutely. Rather, parentage testing excludes animals that '''cannot''' be the parents of a particular offspring. In the simplest terms, we use the genetic markers to exclude animals as possible parents, with the goal of having only two animals (a sire and a dam) left as the most likely parents for that offspring after all others have been excluded. This is why all possible parents must be genotyped and included in the comparison to get accurate results, but the inclusion of animals that can be excluded due to location, color, or other factors is discouraged. | ||
[REVISING] | |||
The newest type of parentage panels typically utilize 96 SNP (or single nucleotide polymorphism) markers. To account for genotyping errors, one exclusion out of all the markers in the panel is typically allowed and still determine parentage. Two to three exclusions would indicate a need to re-test the sample to rule out contamination, poor DNA quality, or poor genotyping results. More than three exclusions will lead to a complete exclusion of that animal as a potential parent <ref name="International Society for Animal Genetics 2012">International Society for Animal Genetics. (2012). Guidelines for cattle parentage verification based on SNP markers. http://www.isag.us/Docs/Guideline-for-cattle-SNP-use-for-parentage-2012.pdf</ref>. Research has shown that parentage can be determined with greater specificity with a larger number of SNP markers (around 400), but at a greater cost. A balance between cost effectiveness and having a reasonable ability to eliminate animals that could not have been the parents must be achieved. | The newest type of parentage panels typically utilize 96 SNP (or single nucleotide polymorphism) markers. To account for genotyping errors, one exclusion out of all the markers in the panel is typically allowed and still determine parentage. Two to three exclusions would indicate a need to re-test the sample to rule out contamination, poor DNA quality, or poor genotyping results. More than three exclusions will lead to a complete exclusion of that animal as a potential parent <ref name="International Society for Animal Genetics 2012">International Society for Animal Genetics. (2012). Guidelines for cattle parentage verification based on SNP markers. http://www.isag.us/Docs/Guideline-for-cattle-SNP-use-for-parentage-2012.pdf</ref>. Research has shown that parentage can be determined with greater specificity with a larger number of SNP markers (around 400), but at a greater cost. A balance between cost effectiveness and having a reasonable ability to eliminate animals that could not have been the parents must be achieved. | ||
Older parentage panels utilized Microsatelllite markers, and these panels typically had a smaller number of markers. Parentage cannot be determined if animals are not genotyped on the same type of panel, as the markers at the same loci cannot be compared between these panels. | Older parentage panels utilized Microsatelllite markers, and these panels typically had a smaller number of markers. Parentage cannot be determined if animals are not genotyped on the same type of panel, as the markers at the same loci cannot be compared between these panels. | ||
=Both vs one parent genotyped= | |||
[FILL IN HERE] | |||
More detailed information on parentage testing along with relevant examples can be found at: | More detailed information on parentage testing along with relevant examples can be found at: | ||
[https:// | [https://beef-cattle.extension.org/parentage-testing/] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:58, 21 October 2021
Genotypic data are often used for parentage testing for embryo transfer calves, for cases of ambiguous breeding dates, and to establish sire identity of calves for producers who utilize multiple-sire pastures. Additionally, potentially high-impact seedstock such as AI sires are often required to be parentage tested. The concept behind using genetic markers for parentage testing is based on the fact that each animal receives one allele from each parent, which makes up the animal's genotype For example, for an animal that is Aa, the A came from one parent, while the a came from the other. But an animal cannot be, say, an AA if the sire was AA and the dam was aa. Because genotyping is not 100% accurate, many loci should be evaluated to determine if the designated parents are likely to be correct.
One common misconception of parentage testing is that the test determines parentage absolutely. Rather, parentage testing excludes animals that cannot be the parents of a particular offspring. In the simplest terms, we use the genetic markers to exclude animals as possible parents, with the goal of having only two animals (a sire and a dam) left as the most likely parents for that offspring after all others have been excluded. This is why all possible parents must be genotyped and included in the comparison to get accurate results, but the inclusion of animals that can be excluded due to location, color, or other factors is discouraged.
[REVISING] The newest type of parentage panels typically utilize 96 SNP (or single nucleotide polymorphism) markers. To account for genotyping errors, one exclusion out of all the markers in the panel is typically allowed and still determine parentage. Two to three exclusions would indicate a need to re-test the sample to rule out contamination, poor DNA quality, or poor genotyping results. More than three exclusions will lead to a complete exclusion of that animal as a potential parent [1]. Research has shown that parentage can be determined with greater specificity with a larger number of SNP markers (around 400), but at a greater cost. A balance between cost effectiveness and having a reasonable ability to eliminate animals that could not have been the parents must be achieved.
Older parentage panels utilized Microsatelllite markers, and these panels typically had a smaller number of markers. Parentage cannot be determined if animals are not genotyped on the same type of panel, as the markers at the same loci cannot be compared between these panels.
Both vs one parent genotyped
[FILL IN HERE]
More detailed information on parentage testing along with relevant examples can be found at:
References
- ↑ International Society for Animal Genetics. (2012). Guidelines for cattle parentage verification based on SNP markers. http://www.isag.us/Docs/Guideline-for-cattle-SNP-use-for-parentage-2012.pdf
