Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.

Talk:Gene Edited Animal Data: Difference between revisions

From BIF Guidelines Wiki
Latest comment: 11 October by Bgolden in topic BLG Comments on new content
No edit summary
(Undo revision 2819 by Bgolden (talk))
Line 3: Line 3:
* I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long.  Good intro
* I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long.  Good intro
* Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data?
* Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data?
* Should we add a recommendation for offspring of gene edited parents that an indication should be made on the registration and reports?
* Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC
 


All good stuff. [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
All good stuff. [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:25, 11 October 2024

BLG Comments on new content

  • I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long. Good intro
  • Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data?
  • Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC

All good stuff. Bruce L. Golden (talk) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]