Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.

Data Collection: Difference between revisions

From BIF Guidelines Wiki
Line 42: Line 42:


=[[Carcass Data Collection at the Packing Plant]]=
=[[Carcass Data Collection at the Packing Plant]]=
Content by Tommy Perkins
===[[Cooperation Between Packer, Feedlot and Producer | Cooperation Between Packer, Feedlot and Producer]]===
===[[Dressed Carcass Yield, Quality Grade and Yield Grade |  Dressed Carcass Yield, Quality Grade and Yield Grade]]===
===[[Recommended Carcass Data Collection Traits | Recommended Carcass Data Collection Traits]]===
===[[Measures of Tenderness | Measures of Tenderness]]===
====[[Slice Shear Force | Slice Shear Force]]====
====[[Warner-Bratzler Force | Warner-Bratzler Force]]====
===[[Required Carcass Data Collection for Use in Genetic Evaluations | Required Carcass Data Collection for Use in Genetic Evaluations]]===


=[[Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)]]=
=[[Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)]]=

Revision as of 20:44, 30 May 2019

Data Collection for Seedstock Producers

At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While data quality is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicators, accurate identification of animals, parents, contemporary groups, and other important details (e.g., age) are essential.

At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by several clearly identified factors. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.

In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective beef cattle identification system is essential. Standards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data, including genomic information. Because the number of animals processed in genetic evaluation is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification are often implemented in place of using a full registration identifier.

Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered.  By contrast, inventory-based Whole Herd Reporting (WHR) requires the collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. Where possible, whole herd reporting is recommended to capture the greatest amount of complete cowherd information. Data recording on individual cows is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most important determinant of profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for the prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). The female production data to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.

Regardless of whether using an inventory-based reporting system or not, accurate phenotypic data collection is vital to genetic evaluation. Collection of complete and accurate data on calves, bulls, heifers, mature cows, or fed cattle (including carcass data) is critical to making genetic improvement. Producers may also be interested in working with their breed associations to provide data for novel traits, where EPDs may be under development. When reporting these data, it is also vital to include appropriate contemporary grouping information to ensure that the data is appropriately incorporated into the evaluation. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting.


Identification Systems

Whole Herd Reporting

Contemporary Groups

Data Collection on Calves

Data Collection on Yearling Bulls

Data Collection on Yearling Heifers

Data Collection on Mature Cows

Pregnancy Data

Gestation Length

Calving Interval

Intake

Novel Traits

Genomic Data

Data Collection for Commercial Producers

Data Collection at Feedlots

Carcass Data Collection at the Packing Plant

Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)